|
 |

|
 |
 |
|
Prevention of
Terrorism Act and Gender |
|
 |
|
The case concerned a woman and a teenaged
girl who were arrested following the bomb
blasts in Mumbai on 28th July 2003 and 25th
August, 2003 in which 53 people had died.
Among the five persons who were arrested
were the woman and her teenaged daughter.
The media tried the two even before they
were charged. From every Muslim man |
 |
being labeled as a ‘potential terrorist’,
now every Muslim woman and even a child
could be labeled as a `potential terrorist’.
There were even baseless claims that the
arrested persons - the men, the woman and the
young minor girl – had ‘confessed’ that they
have committed this to avenge the atrocities
committed on Muslims in Gujarat. These
supposedly confessional statements could be used
against them during the trial under the
draconian provisions of the anti-terrorist
enactment, POTA (Prevention of Terrorist
Activities Act). We were also perturbed by the
precedent of charging a minor with the draconian
law of POTA. In light of all this, we decided to
intervene along with lawyers working on child
rights issues.
Our first step was to safeguard the rights of
the minor girl in custodial situation. We also
met the mother of the girl and made an
application before the Juvenile Court seeking
permission for the girl to meet her mother. We
also simultaneously approached the Special Court
judge dealing with POTA cases and obtained an
order for the mother to meet her daughter every
fortnight.
After a few months, we were able to secure
the discharge for the girl, as the police
investigation did not yield any evidence
against her. Yet prior to her discharge, the
media coverage had already branded her as a
`terrorist’. Her release, for lack of
evidence, provided an opportunity to
challenge the distorted images that the
media creates. We are concerned |
|
 |
with the stigma a minor accused in a crime
faces, even after her discharge, due to the
sensational media coverage. Along with
intervening in the child’s case we also
requested an experienced criminal lawyers of
Mumbai to intervene on behalf of the mother
and subsequently she was also discharged.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|